Every day, I walk into a classroom where students bring more than one language to the table, and I see it as one of our greatest instructional assets.
Multilingual students show incredible flexibility in thinking, resourcefulness in problem-solving, and creativity in how they express ideas. These are strengths we must design for.
Translanguaging is the strategic use of all a student’s language resources to support understanding. It empowers students to:
Clarify scientific concepts
Engage in rigorous classroom discussions
Reflect deeply in their preferred language
In my science class, students fluidly move between Spanish and English. They annotate lab data, construct CER arguments, and explain phenomena using both languages as needed. The result is a deeper understanding and greater participation.
Students thrive when lessons connect to their identities. A curriculum that reflects students' backgrounds fosters engagement and elevates learning. Here are some examples from my practice:
During a biodiversity unit, students explore species native to their countries of origin.
For chemical changes, we analyze traditional recipes and cooking processes.
In climate studies, students collect air quality data from their own neighborhoods and advocate in their communities.
When students see themselves in the content, they show up more fully as learners.
Curricula that invite adaptation allow educators to meet learners where they are. I’ve moved toward a model built on:
Clear standards and learning goals
Modular resources that support bilingual learners
Time and autonomy to tailor instruction to real student needs
Scripted curricula offer structure, but flexible frameworks offer true responsiveness. Teachers deserve the tools and freedom to adjust for their learners, especially in bilingual settings.
When we give multilingual students space to use their full linguistic and cultural selves, we cultivate:
Stronger cognitive connections
Greater confidence in expressing ideas
A deeper sense of belonging and identity in school
We build equity by centering voice, choice, and relevance, alongside ensuring access.
Bilingualism drives global thinking. Multiculturalism drives innovation. A classroom designed with these principles is better for all students, not just language learners.
Are you designing or adapting curriculum for bilingual or multilingual learners? What has worked in your context?
Let’s swap tools and insight, drop a comment, or message me directly. I’m always looking to learn from fellow educators.
June, 24, 2025
We recently tried an experiment: for just 2.5 weeks, my 8th-grade bilingual students completed quick, structured science writing challenges using WeWillWrite.
Here’s what we saw:
📊 90% of students showed growth
📈 Average writing scores increased by 223%
🧠 Students began using more precise science vocabulary and writing clearer explanations
These weren’t long essays: just targeted prompts that encouraged reflection, evidence-based thinking, and better communication. The improvement wasn’t just in grammar; it was in thinking.
This shows the power of:
✅ Frequent practice
✅ Student-friendly prompts
✅ A clear structure for writing in science class
I’m excited to keep going and see what’s possible with a bit of consistency and the right tools.
Have you tried integrating writing into your science or content-area class? I'd love to hear what’s working for you.
#ScienceTeaching #BilingualEd #MiddleSchoolScience #WritingToLearn #NGSS #EdTech #WeWillWrite #TeacherGrowth
June, 18, 2025
The rapid evolution of wearable technology, exemplified by the emergence of smart glasses, is poised to fundamentally reshape the educational landscape. The TED Talk by Shahram Izadi, “The Next Computer? Your Glasses,” serves as a potent reminder of the transformative potential and the concurrent challenges this technology presents. While the allure of augmented reality in everyday life, providing features like real-time navigation for travelers as seen in devices like the Even Realities G1, is undeniable, its impending integration into classrooms within the next decade demands immediate and thoughtful consideration from educational institutions. The era of passively observing technological advancements is over; schools must proactively address the multifaceted implications of smart glasses to ensure equity, security, and the integrity of the learning environment. The questions surrounding equitable access, the security of assessments, the role of assistive technology, and the safeguarding of privacy are no longer abstract hypotheticals but pressing realities that need immediate policy action. Failure to act decisively will leave schools ill-prepared for a transformation that is not anymore on the horizon, but already underway.
One of the most immediate and significant challenges posed by the proliferation of smart glasses within educational settings is the potential compromise of assessment integrity. Traditional methods of ensuring fair testing conditions rely on the ability to control students' access to external information, primarily through the management of smartphones and tablets. However, smart glasses introduce a new paradigm, offering a far more discreet means of accessing information or receiving real-time assistance without detection. Even seemingly benign features such as integrated translation tools or accessibility aids could be woefully misused during examinations, undermining the validity of the assessment. To preserve the credibility of academic evaluations as genuine measures of student learning, schools must rethink and adapt their approaches to securing testing environments. Potential solutions may include requiring students to temporarily remove all wearable technology during assessments or the development and implementation of “secure exam modes” within smart glass software that effectively restrict unauthorized access to external resources. Without the establishment of clear and enforceable protocols, the fundamental trustworthiness of academic assessments will be severely jeopardized.
While the threat to testing security is a genuine concern, it is also crucial to acknowledge and embrace the significant potential of smart glasses as powerful assistive technology. Students with a range of needs, including visual impairments, learning disabilities, and language barriers, could obtain substantial benefits from features such as real-time magnification, instant language translation, and voice-to-text capabilities integrated into wearable devices. For these learners, smart glasses are not an unfair advantage, but rather a vital tool that can promote more equitable access to learning opportunities. Therefore, schools must begin the process of crafting Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) and 504 plans that specifically account for the integration of smart wearables as necessary accommodations. Implementing blanket bans on smart glasses during testing or regular instruction could inadvertently discriminate against students who genuinely rely on these technologies to participate fully in their education. Policymakers face the critical task of striking a delicate balance between maintaining the security and integrity of assessments and ensuring equitable access for all learners. In fact, educational districts may need to consider including basic smart glasses in their assistive technology budgets, mirroring existing provisions for tools like speech-to-text software or specialized reading devices.
Another substantial challenge presented by the increasing prevalence of smart glasses in schools is the potential erosion of privacy. Unlike traditional devices such as phones or laptops, smart glasses possess the inherent capability to discreetly capture video, audio, and various forms of environmental data, making it exceedingly difficult for educators to monitor or even detect when recording is taking place. This raises profound concerns regarding student privacy, the protection of intellectual property, and even the safety and security of both staff and students. The complexity of this issue is further amplified when considering that smart glasses may also serve as prescription eyewear, blurring the lines between essential vision correction and potential security risks. To mitigate these concerns, schools must establish clear, comprehensive, and strictly enforced rules and guidelines delineating describing when and where the use of smart wearables is allowed, particularly during sensitive activities such as testing, counseling sessions, or private conferences between students and teachers. Without the implementation of robust privacy protections, the widespread adoption of smart glasses could foster an environment of constant surveillance, potentially eroding trust and open communication between students and educators.
The introduction of smart glasses into the educational ecosystem also carries the risk of worsening existing equity gaps among students. In the initial stages of their adoption, these devices are likely to be expensive, placing them beyond the financial reach of many families. Consequently, students whose parents can afford these technologies may gain significant academic advantages, such as access to real-time language translation, instant information retrieval, and personalized learning assistance, creating a disparity that their less affluent peers cannot overcome. To uphold the principles of fairness and equal opportunity, school districts may need to consider providing non-digital prescription eyeglasses for students during tests or issuing standardized wearable technology to students with demonstrated legitimate needs. Otherwise, a reliance on privately owned smart glasses could create a two-tiered educational system: one enhanced by sophisticated, invisible technology, and another left to navigate learning with traditional tools. In the long term, as wearable technology becomes more ubiquitous and increasingly challenging to regulate, schools may need to fundamentally rethink traditional assessment methods, shifting the focus from rote memorization and information retrieval towards the evaluation of deeper critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities, and creative application of knowledge.
Beyond the immediate considerations of classroom practice and student equity, the emergence of smart glasses needs an urgent and comprehensive update to existing school policies and relevant legal frameworks. The majority of current Acceptable Use Policies are primarily designed to manage the use of laptops, tablets, and smartphones and are not adequately equipped to address the unique characteristics of wearable technology that can seamlessly and invisibly integrate into daily life. New guidelines must explicitly define the permissible times and contexts for the use of smart glasses on school grounds, during instructional activities, and within assessment settings. Furthermore, privacy protections enshrined in laws such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) will require reinterpretation and adaptation to account for the passive data collection capabilities inherent in wearable devices. Educational districts that delay addressing these policy and legal considerations until smart glasses become widespread risk losing control over the ways in which this technology impacts fundamental aspects of education, including equity, safety, and academic integrity. Proactive and forward-thinking policies must be developed now, through meaningful consultation with teachers, students, parents, and legal experts, to foster an environment of trust and ensure that technology serves to enhance learning without inadvertently undermining its core principles.
The current wave of smart glasses is not an isolated technological event, but rather a harbinger of further advancements in wearable and embedded technologies. Within the next 10 to 15 years, the emergence of smart contact lenses, offering similar augmented reality capabilities without any visible external device, is a likely prospect. If school systems are already grappling with the challenges of adapting to current and near-future wearable technology, the task of regulating and managing invisible technologies embedded directly into students' daily lives will be exponentially more complex. This underscores the critical importance of commencing proactive planning now. Educational districts that view wearables as a distant or peripheral concern risk being overwhelmed by the accelerating pace of technological change. Technology must be a tool that serves the principles of equity and access, not a force that widens existing disparities. Education leaders bear the responsibility of ensuring that the adoption of new technological tools strengthens access to learning, promotes fairness for all students, and empowers student agency, rather than deepening societal divides or eroding trust within the educational community. The future of education will favor those systems that demonstrate foresight and prepare diligently for the technological transformations ahead, rather than those that are forced to react to changes already in motion.